Legal Issues Apple Is Facing

In 1988, after Microsoft`s introduction of Windows 2.0, Apple filed a lawsuit against Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard, alleging that Microsoft Windows and HP`s NewWave infringed Apple`s copyrights on the Macintosh user interface. Among other things, the use of overlapping and resizable windows in Windows 2.0 was cited. The case was one of the «look and feel» copyright lawsuits of the 1980s. After several years in court, Apple`s lawsuit against Microsoft was dismissed, largely due to a license John Sculley negotiated with Bill Gates for Windows 1.0. The decision was upheld on appeal in 1994, but litigation on the issue continued until 1997, when the two companies entered into a wide-ranging settlement involving Microsoft buying non-voting Apple stock. [164] [165] A new trial is scheduled for March 2014, in which Apple will try to prevent Samsung from selling some of its current devices in the United States. The case will include further debates on financial compensation. [242] The 2014 lawsuit accuses Samsung of infringing five Apple Inc. patents in 10 phone and tablet models, while Samsung responded with a counterclaim alleging that two patents for nine Apple phones and tablets were infringed. Jury selection for the trial took place on March 31, 2014.

[248] Samsung will win $6 million if the jury rules in its favor, while Apple is seeking $2 billion in damages and could file similar lawsuits against other Android phone makers because the relevant patent issues go beyond Samsung`s software technology. [249] Apple has long been the target of numerous campaigns because of workers` rights issues at its suppliers` factories. The Associated Press reported on an ongoing congressional investigation into the matter, with members of the U.S. Congress stating that commercial storage and use of location information without a consumer`s explicit consent is illegal under applicable law, but Apple defended its use of customer tracking in a letter released by the House of Representatives on May 9, 2011. [51] [52] National Public Radio`s Chief Technology Officer published an article examining data collected from his own iPhone and showing examples of data collected and maps correlating the data. [53] In addition, digital forensics researchers have indicated that they have been regularly using data collected from Apple mobile devices when working with law enforcement agencies investigating crimes since at least mid-2010. [54] Contrary to previous statements, Apple revealed during a hearing with the United States. Senate Judiciary Committee that a «software bug» caused iPhones to continue sending anonymous location data to the company`s servers, even if location services were disabled on the device. [55] We publish guidelines on legal procedures for governments and law enforcement agencies around the world and publish transparency reports twice a year detailing the types of requests we receive and how we respond to them. In addition, we regularly provide training to law enforcement officers on the types of data available from Apple and how to obtain it in accordance with our Litigation Policy. In January 2008, Apple filed an objection with the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board against the New Yorker (NYC) trademark application for the «Big Apple» logo for designer Blake E`s New York GreeNYC initiative.

Reviews include assessments of whether there is decision-making that relies on algorithmic systems and the impact such decision-making has on individuals and their rights. Risk levels are assigned to all uses of the data, with review periods ranging from 1 to 2 years depending on the risk identified. When personal data is used for the development of algorithmic systems, we offer our users the opportunity to consent to and control such use of the data, in accordance with Apple`s industry-leading user control. We also fully assess the confidentiality practices of all acquisitions as part of the PIA process. PIAs consider how laws affect data protection and assess the associated privacy risks in the relevant jurisdictions in which we operate. PIA examiners are also trained to identify and highlight the potential impact on freedom of expression. Apple also regularly works with a wide range of civil society representatives from around the world on a variety of privacy and freedom of expression issues, including privacy by technology design and encryption. On February 5, 2007, Apple Inc. and Apple Corps also resolved their trademark dispute and agreed that Apple Inc. would own all of the marks associated with «Apple» and license some of those marks to Apple Corps for future use. The settlement ended the ongoing litigation between the companies, with each party bearing its own legal fees and Apple Inc.

continuing to use Apple`s name and logos on iTunes. The full terms of the settlement were confidential. [90] In the first week of January 2014, a filing in U.S. District Court in San Jose showed that the legal chiefs of both parties had agreed to meet by February 19, 2014, to conduct settlement talks. Samsung and Apple responded to a court order ordering the conclusion of such a meeting before a new trial began in March 2014. One in three Samsung executives met with Cook, but the filing did not reveal the representative`s name. [247] In an initial dispute over domain names, two months before the iMac was announced in July 1998, Apple sued Abdul Traya, then a teenager. After registering the domain name appleimac.com draw attention to the web hosting business he ran in his parents` basement, a note on Trasa`s website stated that his plan was to «drive traffic to our servers and try to put the domain up for sale. [sic]»[92] After a legal battle that lasted nearly a year, Apple settled out of court, paid Tragas` legal fees and gave it a «token payment» in exchange for the domain name. [93] In June 2006, consumer ombudsmen in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark challenged Apple`s iTunes End User License Agreement (EULA) through the Norwegian Consumer Ombudsman, Bjørn Erik Thon, who claimed that Apple was violating contract and copyright laws in their country.