Hans Kelsen created «pure legal theory.» Kelsen says law is a «normative science.» In Kelson`s definition of the law, the law does not attempt to describe what must happen, but only sets out certain rules to be followed. LAW, PROSPECTIVE. One who cares and regulates people`s future actions and does not interfere in any way with what happened. LAW, GENERAL. The common law is that which derives its strength and authority from the universal consent and immemorial practice of the people. It has never received the sanction of the legislature by an express act, which is the criterion by which it differs from the legislative act. He was never reduced to writing; However, this expression does not mean that all these laws are currently only verbally or communicated only orally from ancient times to the present day, but that the evidence of our common law is contained in our compendiums of reports and depends on the general practice and judicial decisions of our courts. 2. The common law is derived from two sources, the common law of England and the practice and decision of our own courts. In some states, English common law has been adopted by statute.
There is no general rule as to which part of English common law is valid and binding. Running the line of distinction is a matter of embarrassment for the courts, and the absence of it is a great perplexity for the student. Kirb. Rep. Pref. However, it may generally be noted that it is binding if it has not been superseded by the Constitution of the United States or individual states, or by their legislative decrees, or modified by custom, and if it is based on reason and in conformity with the spirit and customs of the people. 3. The term «common law» appears in the seventh section of the Constitution Amendments of the United States. «In common law trials, where the amount in dispute may not exceed twenty dollars, this section states: `The right to a jury trial is preserved.
The «common law» referred to here is the common law of England and not that of any particular state. 1 gall. 20; 1 bald head. 558; 3 wheat. 223; 3 pets. R. 446; 1 bald head. No.
554. The term is used as opposed to equity, admiralty and maritime law. 3 Peter 446; 1 bald head. 554. 4. The common law of England is not to be understood in all respects as that of the United States or of certain states; Its general principles are adopted only to the extent that they are applicable to our situation. 2 animals, 144; 8 Peter 659; 9. Cranch, p.
333; 9 p. and R. 330; 1 Black 66, 82, 206; Kirby, 117; 5 Har. and John. 356; 2 Aik. 187; Charlt. 172; 1 ham. 243. See 5 cow. 628; 5 Peter 241; 1 Dall.
67; 1 Fair 61; 9 Selection. 532; 3 Green. 162; 6 Green. 55; 3 Gill & John. 62; Sampson`s address to the New York Historical Association; 1 Welsh. R. 489; 3 Corn. R.
114; 2 Dall. 2, 297, 384; 7 Cranch, r. 32; 1 wheat. R. 415; 3 wheat. 223; 1 Black. R. 205; 8 pets. R. 658; 5 Cowen, r. 628; 2 stew. No.
362. Civil law is the legal system used in most countries of the world today. In civil law, the sources recognized as authoritative are mainly legislation – especially codifications in constitutions or laws adopted by the government – and customary law. [83] Codifications date back millennia, with an early example being the Babylonian Codex Hammurabi. Modern civil law systems derive essentially from legal systems promulgated by the Byzantine emperor Justinian I in the 6th century and rediscovered by Italy in the 11th century. [84] Roman law at the time of the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was highly procedural and lacked a professional legal class. [85] Instead, a lay judge, iudex, was chosen to rule. Decisions were not systematically published, so that any case law that developed was obscured and almost unrecognized.
[86] Each case should be redecided from state laws, reflecting the (theoretical) insignificance of judges` decisions for future cases in today`s civil justice systems. From 529 to 534 AD, the Byzantine emperor Justinian I codified and consolidated Roman law, so that only one-twentieth of the mass of legal texts of the past remained. [87] This corpus became known as the Corpus Juris Civilis. As one legal historian wrote, «Justinian consciously looked back at the golden age of Roman law and sought to bring it back to the peak it had reached three centuries earlier.» [88] The Justinian Codex remained in force in the East until the fall of the Byzantine Empire. Western Europe, on the other hand, relied on a mixture of Theodosian codices and Germanic customary law until the Justinian Codex was adopted in the 11th century. It was rediscovered in the nineteenth century and researchers at the University of Bologna used it to interpret their own laws. [89] Civil codifications closely based on Roman law spread throughout Europe, as well as some influences of religious laws such as canon law, until the Enlightenment; In the 19th century, the France with the Civil Code and Germany with the Civil Code modernized their legal systems. Both codes have strongly influenced not only the legal systems of continental European countries (e.g. Greece), but also the Japanese and Korean legal traditions. [90] [91] Today, countries with civil justice systems range from Russia] and Turkey to most Central and Latin American countries.
[92] Hegel believed that civil society and the state were polar opposites in the scheme of his dialectical theory of history. The modern civil society of the dipole state has been reproduced in the theories of Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx. [165] [166] In postmodern theory, civil society is necessarily a source of law by being the basis from which people form opinions and lobby for what they believe to be right.